Return to Transcripts main page

NEW DAY

Manhunt for Gunmen in Museum Massacre; White House Condemns Tunisia Terror Attack; Death Threats Made Against Ambassador Caroline Kennedy; UVA Student's Violent Arrest Sparks Protests; Secret Service May Have Erased Video. Aired 6-6:30a ET

Aired March 19, 2015 - 06:00   ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.


(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: We just heard gunshots.

[05:59:00] UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: The attack started outside the national parliament building.

PAUL CRUICKSHANK, CNN TERRORISM ANALYST: There's been no official claim of responsibility yet from ISIS. But many of their supporters have been celebrating.

ALISYN CAMEROTA, CO-HOST: Japanese police are investigating death threats against Caroline Kennedy.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: We take every step possible to protect our personnel.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: The Japanese government will take this very seriously.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: (EXPLETIVE DELETED) racists! How did this happen, you (EXPLETIVE DELETED) racists?

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: His face to literally be bashed in by concrete.

TERESA SULLIVAN, UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA PRESIDENT: I felt it in my stomach. Seeing the blood run down that young man's face.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: The Secret Service may have erased video surveillance footage.

WHITE BLITZER, CNN ANCHOR: Agents drove into a White House barrier while returning from a party.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: If they had two tapes, they must have others.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

ANNOUNCER: This is NEW DAY with Chris Cuomo, Alisyn Camerota and Michaela Pereira.

CAMEROTA: Good morning, everyone. Welcome to your NEW DAY. It is Thursday, March 19, 6 a.m. in the East. Chris Cuomo is off today, and John Berman joins us. Great to have you with us.

Up first, terror in Tunisia, a frantic manhunt underway for three terrorists who escaped after storming the national museum in Tunis. Nineteen people slaughtered, most of them tourists. Two gunmen killed by security forces during the attack.

MICHAELA PEREIRA, CO-HOST: Tunisia's prime minister describing the massacre as a cowardly act. Now while no one has claimed responsibility, at least one of the suspects killed in that attack was known to authorities. Question now: was ISIS involved?

Our coverage begins with CNN senior international correspondent, Arwa Damon, live from Tunis.

Good morning.

ARWA DAMON, CNN SENIOR INTERNATIONAL CORRESPONDENT: Good morning.

And that one gunman may have been known to the intelligence apparatus, but exactly why? That at this stage is unclear as this nation tries to cope with the aftermath of the violence that broke out at the museum just behind us.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

DAMON (voice-over): This morning, a massive manhunt for at least three suspects continues. This as scores of international visitors depart Tunis on a cruise liner, following the deadliest attack on tourists in the Middle East in over a decade.

On Wednesday, men strapped with high-powered guns dressed in military fatigues stormed the Bardo National Museum in Tunisia's capital, opening fire inside. The museum connected to Tunisia's parliamentary building, full of lawmakers.

SABRINE GHOUBATINI, TUNISIAN LAWMAKER (via phone): We heard a firefight just next to the building. It was very strong and the administration came to tell us to lay down.

DAMON: Security forces killing two of the gunmen, but not before the attackers shot and killed at least 19 people, including 17 tourists from around the world. More than 20 others were injured in the attack, including this man, visited in the hospital by Tunisia's president.

This morning, concern the brazen attack could have been the work of ISIS supporters, the opening of a new front for their violence in North Africa.

Out of the 20,000 foreigners that have joined the fight in Iraq and Syria, a British think tank says up to 3,000 of them are from Tunisia, the largest number from any country.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: We're seeing, really, I think Northern Africa is falling now. Not just to al Qaeda affiliates. It's been now to ISIS.

(END VIDEOTAPE)

DAMON: Michaela, people here are horrified by the violence that took place, but they are also just as horrified and anxious about the potential impact this is going to have on the country's tourism industry that is at the very core of its economy, many believing that this was a deliberate blow to bring Tunisia, the Arab Spring's success story, arguably, to its knees.

PEREIRA: We're going to explore that a little further in the program. Thanks so much for that, Arwa.

Meanwhile, the White House is condemning the terrorist attack in Tunisia, the Obama administration vowing to stand beside the North African nation's burgeoning democracy.

White House correspondent Michelle Kosinski has that part of our story for us.

Good morning, Michelle.

MICHELLE KOSINSKI, CNN WHITE HOUSE CORRESPONDENT: The victims in this attack were from at least eight countries, none of them believed to be American.

But the White House say that just after the attack, U.S. officials were in touch with their Tunisian counterparts, offered condolences, stands ready to offer help. And in a statement, the White House press secretary said that the U.S. is proud of its cooperation with Tunisia in counterterrorism and security issues; will continue to stand with Tunisia against terrorist violence.

And even the first lady, who's traveling right now in Japan and met with the U.S. ambassador to Japan, Caroline Kennedy, who recently has been receiving death threats, spoke about the attacks.

(BEGIN VIDEO CLIP)

MICHELLE OBAMA, FIRST LADY: Our hearts go out to the loved ones of those who were lost here in Japan and around the world. They are very much in our thoughts and prayers today.

(END VIDEO CLIP)

KOSINSKI: The State Department has had to deal with threats in the region that necessitated the closing of the embassy in Yemen, for example. Just this week temporary closures of embassies in Saudi Arabia and in Djibouti in the Horn of Africa. But so far, the embassy there in Tunisia remains open -- John.

BERMAN: All right. Thanks, Michelle, so much.

Now to the investigation into death threats against U.S. ambassador to Japan, Caroline Kennedy, and another American diplomat. The U.S. is now working with Japan to find out who is behind these threats.

CNN's Anna Coren is live in Tokyo with the latest -- Anna. ANNA COREN, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Yes, John. That investigation ongoing

into those death threats made against U.N. ambassador for Japan, Caroline Kennedy. She's been on the job for 16 months. She's well- respected and admired here.

Those death threats also made to the U.S. consul general in Okinawa, which of course, is where 50,000 U.S. troops are stationed.

Now these threats, they were made by a man who was speaking in English. He said, "I want to kill Caroline Kennedy." And the U.S. State Department, they have said they are working with their Japanese authorities very closely, obviously, to insure the safety of American diplomats.

[06:05:09] This comes just a few weeks after that violent attack on the U.S. ambassador for South Korea, Mark Lippert, who was attacked by a crazed man with a knife. He slashed his face and arms. He had to have 80 stitches. So in light of that attack, that is why authorities here in Japan are taking these death threats so seriously.

But still, Caroline Kennedy, this 57-year-old daughter of President John F. Kennedy, she was going about her normal routine. Obviously, she is accompanying U.S. first lady Michelle Obama, who is here in country, pushing her girls' education initiative. And she also spoke about the attacks in Tunisia, which have claimed the lives of three Japanese citizens -- Alisyn.

CAMEROTA: OK, Arwa [SIC]. Thanks so much for all that background.

Let's talk about all of this. We want to bring in deputy State Department spokesperson Marie Harf, who joins us from Switzerland. Good morning, Marie.

MARIE HARF, DEPUTY SPOKESPERSON, STATE DEPARTMENT: Good morning, Alisyn.

CAMEROTA: We have a lot to talk to you about, so let's start with Tunisia. From preliminary press reports, it appears that these Tunisian terrorists consider this perhaps some sort of qualifying test, to either pledge allegiance to ISIS or get the attention of ISIS. Is that your analysis, as well?

HARF: Well, Alisyn, I know our intelligence community, everyone back in D.C. is looking to get all the facts right now. And there's still a lot of unknowns here, so I want to make sure we have all of those before we jump to conclusion. And before we jump to sort of broader conclusions about what this might mean for Tunisia.

As we've talked about before, Tunisia has been relatively stable. Their security forces responded yesterday quickly at the time of the attack. But I think that we're going to see happens next here in Tunisia and really get all the facts before we make broader conclusions.

CAMEROTA: And I do want to talk about what this means for Tunisia. Because as you know, Tunisia has been this beacon of democracy in the Middle East. It's the place that people pin their hopes on for what can happen in other countries.

So do you believe that an attack like this, where there are 19 victims, most of them tourists, will change the way Tunisia does business? Will they somehow become less free and open?

HARF: Well, certainly, we hope not. And I don't -- I want to caution people from drawing broader conclusions about the future of Tunisia. This was a horrific attack. We've condemned it in the strongest terms. I expect my boss, Secretary Kerry, to also speak to the Tunisians today, as well. But we'll see what happens going forward.

We work very closely with them. If we have any information that we can share with them that will help them, certainly, we will do that. But I think there is a bright future for Tunisia and we'll see what happen here, Alisyn.

CAMEROTA: Let's talk about what Secretary Kerry is doing in Switzerland this morning with the ongoing nuclear talks with Iran. What are the sticking points this morning?

HARF: Well, there are a lot of issues that are on the table. And one of the things we've always said about this agreement is it's so complicated, you really need each of the pieces to fall into place to get to an agreement.

Obviously, we're very concerned about enrichment, about plutonium, about Iran's nuclear program and the path it has to get to a weapon. And they're obviously very concerned about the sanctions issue.

So our bottom line is we need to get to a year breakout time. We need to cut off their four pathways to get enough material for a nuclear weapon. And we're debating all of those issues right now. We've made progress, but we still have some work to do.

CAMEROTA: About that one-year breakout time that the U.S. is calling for. Why would Iran fight that?

HARF: Well, I'm not sure that they're fighting it, necessarily. I think that they have a nuclear program that they claim is peaceful. And that we have said, if that is the case, there are credible and verifiable steps you can take to prove that.

So really, the devil's in the details here. You know, there's an equation that you can have that will lead you to a year breakout. We're trying to fit all the pieces into that. It's a negotiation on every piece, though, and we don't know if we'll be able to get there.

CAMEROTA: The Iranian foreign minister yesterday made this statement on Iranian television. He says about the negotiations, "We have come closer to common understanding on some issues, and on some issues the distance is a little greater. Political will must be seen in action. Everyone claims that the political will is there. In fact, we must see whether the political will for reaching a solution exists or not." He sounds skeptical.

HARF: Well, I think we're all skeptical. Look, this is such a critical security issue on our side, certainly. We need to make sure that we get a good agreement. We will not take anything less. And that requires a lot of very technical details that we need to get right.

I would agree with Foreign Minister Zarif, though, that we do need to see political will. And we need to see that on the Iranian side. This is the time for them to back up what they said publicly with verifiable steps. They need to show they can get to an agreement here. And that's what we're working to see if we can get done.

[06:10:14] CAMEROTA: You have two more days in this current round in Switzerland. Is a deal going to be done in the next 48 hours?

Harf: If I knew that, Alisyn, I would -- I would probably be much richer, in a different job than I am. These things are really hard to predict here when it comes to these kinds of very difficult negotiations. We have until March 31, as we've seen before. There are a lot of technical issues. We often go up until the very end.

But we need to make progress this week. Because we are very close to the deadline. And we really have been clear that March 31 is a deadline. So we have to make progress. We're talking to the Iranians all day, every day to see if we can.

CAMEROTA: Let's talk about the death threat against Ambassador Caroline Kennedy. Of course, this falls on the heels of the knife attack for Ambassador Mark Lippert and then, of course, Ambassador Chris Stevens, who was killed in Benghazi. Are you doing anything to change the security for our ambassadors?

HARF: Well, I would separate out what happened in Benghazi, obviously, which was a horrible terrorist attack, as we've talked about a great deal, of course, on your network and elsewhere, from what happened in Seoul and then from these recent threats against Ambassador Kennedy.

Any threat we take very seriously. Any time we get information that an ambassador might be threatened, we look at our security posture, we take additional steps if we need to. But we can't verify the credibility of this report yet.

But we are talking to the Japanese government. We'll take additional steps if we need to. And that's obviously something we're very focused on at the State Department.

CAMEROTA: Marie Harf, we appreciate you taking time out of what's going on in Switzerland to talk to NEW DAY. Thanks so much.

Let's get over to Michaela.

HARF: Good to be here.

PEREIRA: All right, Alisyn. Back here at home, hundreds of students at the University of Virginia coming out in force, alleging police brutality following the violent arrest of a student that was all caught on camera. The bloodied student can be heard on video, calling the cops racist after they slammed his head into the pavement.

Police maintain that he was drunk and resisted arrest. The governor has now ordered an investigation.

CNN's Brian Todd is in Charlottesville this morning, covering all the latest information for us.

Brian, what do we know?

BRIAN TODD, CNN CORRESPONDENT: Michaela, this is the very spot where the incident occurred less than 30 hours ago, right here in the shadow of the University of Virginia.

Take a look down here. This is Martese Johnson's blood still on the sidewalk, just about 30 hours after this incident occurred, where he was wrestled down to the ground by police, just outside of the Trinity Irish Pub, where he had been denied entry.

The Black Student Alliance calls his treatment brutal and animalistic.

(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Yo, his head is bleeding! Yo, his head is bleeding!

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: I go to UVA, (EXPLETIVE DELETED)! I go to UVA, (EXPLETIVE DELETED)!

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: You racists! You (EXPLETIVE DELETED) racists!

TODD (voice-over): This disturbing cell phone video at the center of the latest claim of police brutality. Twenty-year-old University of Virginia student Martese Johnson, arrested by uniformed Alcoholic Beverage Control special agents outside a bar near the college, pinned to the pavement. Blood spatters his shirt and covers his face.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: How did this happen?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Where's your I.D.?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: How did this happen, you (EXPLETIVE DELETED) racists?

TODD: According to a statement from the ABC, Johnson was arrested after he was refused entry to a pub. The third-year student was charged with public intoxication and obstruction of justice and received ten stitches to his head at a local area hospital and released. This gruesome booking photo circulated by the university's Black Student Alliance.

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: No justice!

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: No peace!

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: No peace!

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: No peace!

UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: No justice!

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: No peace!

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: No peace!

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: No peace!

TODD: Stoking student outrage, including from UVA's president.

SULLIVAN: I felt it in my stomach, seeing the blood run down that young man's face.

TODD; Hundreds of rallying students flooding UVA's campus, including Martese Johnson himself.

MARTESE JOHNSON, VIOLENT ARREST CAUGHT ON TAPE: We're all part of one community. We deserve to respect each other, especially in times like this.

TODD: The governor launching an investigation to determine whether excessive force was used. The officers involved in that arrest put on administrative duties, pending the results of the probe.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: For his face to be bashed in by concrete, there's no words to describe that.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Where's your I.D.?

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: How did this happen, you (EXPLETIVE DELETED) racists?

(END VIDEOTAPE)

TODD: Now Martese Johnson's attorney, Daniel Watkins, has released a statement saying that Johnson is absolutely devastated by what happened. He describes Johnson as a third-year student at the University of Virginia, majoring in Italian and media studies; a student who holds numerous leadership positions at the school.

Martese Johnson has no criminal record, and his lawyer says that, contrary to earlier reports, he was not denied entry to this Trinity Irish Pub for having a false identification.

Alisyn, back to you.

CAMEROTA: OK. Brian Todd, thanks so much for all of that.

Meanwhile, police in Mesa, Arizona, identifying the suspect in a shooting spree across the Phoenix area that left one person dead and five others wounded. Forty-one-year-old Ryan Giroux, a white supremacist, has an extensive criminal record that includes several stints in prison. A police SWAT team captured Giroux hiding in a vacant condo. No words on his motives. BERMAN: The mastermind of the 2013 terrorist attack at the Westgate

mall in Kenya has been killed in a U.S. drone strike. The Defense Department says Adan Garar was one of several people in a car hit by missiles a week ago in Somalia. Garar has been described as a member of the security wing of al-Shabaab, who wanted to topple Somalia's government. Sixty-seven people died, and more than 200 were injured in the mall attack.

PEREIRA: Americans appear split on whether or not the president's six years in office have been a success. A new CNN/ORC poll shows that half the country considers the president's time in office successful, while 40 percent -- 47 percent say he has been a failure.

Still, 53 percent believe things are going well in the country, the highest of the Obama presidency. Just 21 percent said the same when the president took office.

The president's job approval remains mostly unchanged at 46 percent. By comparison, President George W. Bush was at 37 percent at this point during his presidency.

BERMAN: What you're seeing is, you know, people starting to say that things -- things are OK-ish in the country right now. But that's a vast improvement, though, from several years ago. Look, it takes a long time to come back from a once-in-a-generation setback.

CAMEROTA: It's still interesting to see, though, how split the country is, and that's really in stark relief there. And we're going to be debating all of this with Paul Begala and Tara Setmayer, coming up. So stick around for that.

BERMAN: Tomorrow is the official start of spring, we're told.

PEREIRA: Round of applause for spring -- anyone? Anyone?

BERMAN: I'm skeptical, highly skeptical. Why? Because it's like zero degrees outside, and we now hear it's going to snow.

CAMEROTA: What?

BERMAN: Meteorologist Chad Myers has that for us. Chad?

MYERS: Yes. Spring-ish. If you want to continue the theme here. Tomorrow is spring, one day. We have obviously about 30 hours to go before it's spring. And snow from what Chris would call the whistle pig, one more day. Four inches of snow, so tomorrow is a train day for New York City and the like, because by the time you get home around 6 p.m., it will be snowing.

And the snow is going to be four to six inches, and it will be brief. Because by Sunday it's going to be 50. But here we go, just one more shot, just to add on, just because it's piling on now.

Alisyn, I know you're sick of it. But we're just piling on.

CAMEROTA: You're piling on. BERMAN: Not to place the blame, Chad.

PEREIRA: That was -- that was pointed. Chad, did you feel that? That was pointed.

CAMEROTA: Chad, I actually don't hold you responsible. You have injected levity into this long winter for us. Thanks so much.

PEREIRA: First day of Spring.

CAMEROTA: How dare they?

PEREIRA: How dare it?

CAMEROTA: Meanwhile, another head-shaking moment for the Secret Service. The agency's new director admitting important surveillance video may have been erased. The video reportedly capturing those two agents driving through an active scene and disrupting A suspicious package investigation at the White House. Wait until you hear what one lawmaker says about this.

PEREIRA: We're just talking about the overall feeling in the country. Well, the Fed signaling that it may be ready to raise interest rates for the first time in over seven years. When is that going to happen? And how is it going to impact your wallet?

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)

[06:22:32] BERMAN: Another stunning revelation in the latest Secret Service scandal. The agency director told lawmakers in a closed-door meeting that they may have erased surveillance video that would have captured misconduct, perhaps, by agents at the White House.

CNN's investigative correspondent, Chris Frates, joins us now from Washington with more. Chris, they erased the tapes?

CHRIS FRATES, CNN INVESTIGATIVE CORRESPONDENT: Yes, John. This is another shocking development in the investigation into two Secret Service agents accused of driving their car into a barricade around an active bomb investigation at the White House.

House Oversight Committee Jason Chaffetz tells me that the Secret Service director showed lawmakers two videos in a closed-door briefing earlier this week. When lawmakers asked Director Clancy if there were more videos from other angles, Clancy said they may have been erased, telling them its agency policy to erase the tapes after 72 hours.

Chaffetz told me he's frustrated that Clancy didn't know if there were more tapes, and he wonders if he's getting the run-around. The Secret Service sent me a statement that said, in part, that the agency keeps videos in the event of a, quote, security incident at the White House, but the agency didn't say whether it kept additional videos of this incident.

Chaffetz is launching his own investigation, asking the Secret Service for all its tapes and any other physical evidence, telling me it's unfathomable that the agency would erase tapes every three days. As he put it, Michaela, this is not your local 7-Eleven; this is the White House.

PEREIRA: All right, Chris Frates. Thanks so much.

We want to dig a little deeper with former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino. He's a quite familiar face on our show.

Dan, good morning to you. Thanks for joining me.

DAN BONGINO, FORMER SECRET SERVICE AGENT: Thanks for having me.

PEREIRA: You're part -- you're retired Secret Service. You worked on the president's detail. Tell me: does this pass the smell test to you? Does it smell like a cover-up? Or is this just following protocol to erase these tapes?

BONGINO: Well, I've been on your show and many others on your network and was very critical of the Secret Service...

PEREIRA: Yes, you were.

BONGINO: ... during the fence-jumping incidents and a couple other incidents as well, but I really think this was just a matter of -- let me just explain. There are so many cameras at the White House, and I don't want to tell you how many, obviously. But it would be nearly impossible to maintain a library of all of the videos from every one of these cameras. They probably maintain video from a couple of the larger ones, if nothing has happened, there's no reason to catalog it, they probably just as a matter protocol just naturally write it over.

[06:25:00] PEREIRA: But shouldn't this incident have been flagged and thus be something that would have been kept? And to your point about, you know, cataloging all of it, we live in a digital age. We can store all of that stuff on a hard drive much more easily than stacks of tapes, to your point.

BONGINO: I'm not suggesting in a world of circumstances, this was the best one to evolve. I'm just saying that may have been what happened. And keep in mind, this story, as I said to a number of people on the Sunday show in your network, I think this story has been way overblown. I think there was some bad judgment involved.

But I think there's going to be some significant dialing back of some of the headlines on this story as the days go by. I've gotten a couple of accounts from people who know what actually happened, who have said that this isn't story people think it is. It's a big difference between crashing into a barricade and bumping a traffic cone. That's a big difference.

PEREIRA: Absolutely, and I actually want to address that with you in a second. But even still, even if judgment of how that was initially handled and how extreme it was to begin with of an incident, this does on top of that, it annoys some people, and it's going to smack of a cover-up. Because the fact is we have a producer who has a surveillance camera

at his house. It costs $400. He's got seven different cameras. It takes six -- it keeps the tapes for six days. That's a very simple civilian system. You would think the White House, the people charged with caring for the president and his family, would have redundancy and would have extra measures to make sure those tapes were not erased.

BONGINO: Yes, you're right. And again, I'm not suggesting it was the best option here or even a good idea. I'm just suggesting it may have happened as per some built-in procedure. Maybe that procedure needs to change. It's probably a good idea.

I have cameras in my house, too. They record probably -- I don't even know. I'm just trying to give you some idea of what may have happened. In other words, I don't think it was a conspiracy to hide the incident. As a matter of fact, from what I heard from an insider, they actually wish there were more angles, video angles that show Congress. They're that confident that they're going to be absolved of any wrongdoing.

Let's talk about the incident. You know these guys personally. You know them quite well. And it's not just your own gut instinct. It's what you're hearing from other people, that this was overblown to the extreme. That it wasn't as big of an incident initially, and it was blown out of proportion.

BONGINO: Right. Well, a couple of questions here. If the agents in question were involved in any wrongdoing, then why were they on the phone with our joint operations center, notifying them that they were coming into the White House? One of them had to get his car. That was it.

They were leaving a -- the retirement party for one of the senior agents, and one of them was being dropped off at his car. It doesn't make any sense.

Secondly, if they were infiltrating into an active bomb investigation knowingly, which they weren't, then why were they waved on by the uniformed division officers?

PEREIRA: What about the drinking, Brian [SIC]?

BONGINO: Dan. Well, that part I can't attest to. I wasn't there, and I certainly don't want to go on record in your network and testify to someone's behavior when I didn't witness it.

PEREIRA: Right, right.

BONGINO: But I think the investigation is -- they are going to that bar and pulling, I think, video and receipts. If they were drinking and in a government car, yes, you're going to -- they're going to be in trouble. There's no question about it.

But that's way different than saying that they crashed into a barricade and blew through a bomb investigation. It's just not true. PEREIRA: Yes. That is very good, very good point. We'll end on it

there. Dan Bongino, always a pleasure to have you on our air. Thanks so much for your perspective.

Let us know what you think. I'm sure you have opinions about this. You can tweet us, @NewDay, and also join in the conversation on Facebook.com/NewDay -- Alisyn.

CAMEROTA: OK, Michaela.

No one claiming responsibility for that deadly terror attack in Tunisia. Nineteen people, most of them tourists, slaughtered inside a national museum. We take a closer look at what this means.

(COMMERCIAL BREAK)