Skip to main content

The West must not blame itself for Putin's revanchism

By Robin Niblett, Special to CNN
April 12, 2014 -- Updated 1124 GMT (1924 HKT)
Putin appears to see the world through a unique prism of winner takes all and loser loses everything, says Robin Niblett.
Putin appears to see the world through a unique prism of winner takes all and loser loses everything, says Robin Niblett.
  • There is a growing view Russia was provoked into annexing Crimea, Robin Niblett says
  • This belief is prevalent in Southeast Asia, where China is asserting itself, he says
  • But Niblett says China's president recognizes the logic of win-win diplomacy
  • Putin's "winner takes all" approach, however, requires a strong response, he says

Editor's note: Robin Niblett is director of Chatham House (the Royal Institute of International Affairs) and was previously the executive vice president and chief operating officer of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies. He is the author of "Playing to its Strengths: Rethinking the UK's Role in a Changing World" and editor and contributing author to "America and a Changed World: A Question of Leadership." The views expressed in this commentary are solely Robin Niblett's.

(CNN) -- There is a growing belief among many in the West that Europe and the United States provoked President Putin into annexing Crimea. Moscow's reaction to NATO expansion and to the EU's efforts to bring Ukraine into its orbit was, it is said, inevitable.

In this view, Western leaders backed Putin into a corner and, with the situation worsening in eastern Ukraine, it is time we gave him an exit plan.

Robin Niblett
Robin Niblett

Interestingly, this is the prevalent view in Southeast Asia, a region not lacking a large and assertive neighbor of its own.

In Singapore last week, several prominent figures told me Southeast Asia is managing better the challenge of a resurgent China than Europe is a re-assertive Russia. But this is a misleading comparison. China and Russia present entirely different propositions to their neighbors.

President Xi Jinping recognizes the logic of win-win international politics.

Whilst tightening his political control, he has overseen what is perhaps China's most ambitious strategy for market-led socio-economic reform since the Deng Xiaoping era, and launched an all-out assault on the rampant levels of corruption in the Chinese Communist Party.

Having failed with economic coercion, [Putin] is now also resorting to political and military coercion to prevent Ukraine from escaping Russia's economic stranglehold.
Robin Niblett

In focusing on growth and modernization, Xi is aware of the importance of a stable and prosperous regional environment, and has sought to manage the growing anxiety and resentment that China's rise is causing among its Southeast Asian neighbors. Relations with Japan have deteriorated to a dangerous level, but in China's southern neighborhood Xi has worked hard to improve relations.

Ties with Vietnam and Malaysia have been bolstered, despite competing territorial claims over islands in the South China Sea. China is increasingly active in a range of regional multilateral institutions, and has sustained a constructive political and economic relationship with the United States, despite their competing strategic roles in the region.

Most importantly, China is ever more deeply integrated economically with its neighbors across East Asia, serving as an essential engine of regional economic growth. From a Chinese perspective, the rising tide lifts all boats. Neighbors that are economically strong support China's growth. Given its relative size, China's political influence will only grow as a result.

'Law of jungle'

The contrast between this approach and that of President Putin could not be starker. Putin appears to see the world through a unique prism of winner takes all and loser loses everything. He represents a 19th century "law of the jungle" mentality, in the words of Angela Merkel. This makes Russia an altogether more dangerous neighbor.

Russian separatists in Donetsk dig in
NATO: Pics show Russian military buildup
Ukrainian citizens carry cost of conflict
Russia: No plan to send troops to Ukraine

As tends to be the case with bad neighbors, Russia's belligerence stems from problems at home. Despite recent high global oil prices, Putin presides over an economy in reverse. Russia's current account surplus was already projected to have disappeared this year, before the crisis over Ukraine. Capital outflows amounted to $63 billion last year, a figure at least matched in the first quarter of 2014. In the meantime, growth is projected to fall in 2014 to 0.6% according to Russian figures, after achieving only 1.3% in 2013.

Like Xi, Putin has tightened his control over the media and political opposition. But rather than accompanying political tightening with economic reform, his government has side-stepped market-opening commitments made as part of Russia's WTO accession. And rather than tackling ever-deepening corruption, he has continued to hand his close allies the choicest parts of the Russian economy through Kremlin-led corporate mergers and lucrative concessions.

Regionally, Putin's notion of national security is to surround Russia with what Karel de Gucht, the EU Trade Commissioner, recently described as a string of economic "black holes" (such as Ukraine and Belarus) and "frozen conflicts" (including in Transnistria, Abkhazia and South Ossetia).

These areas remain dependent upon Russia for their economic survival and constitute a further hindrance to Russian economic growth. Where China recognizes the necessity of a stable neighborhood, Putin has manufactured a volatile and vulnerable one.

Nor does he show any interest in exiting this spiral. Having failed with economic coercion, he is now also resorting to political and military coercion to prevent Ukraine from escaping Russia's economic stranglehold.

No return

Russia will not reform under Putin's watch, as some in the West once hoped. He blames the West for Russia's ills and wallows in victimhood. But he avoids reforming the economic system he created, and perceives steps towards embedding the rule of law, accountable government and more open markets around Russia's neighborhood as threats to his and Russia's power.

If the choice now is between trying to bring President Putin gradually in from the cold, or containing his worst instincts towards Russia's European neighbors, the latter is the only rational answer.

Europe and the United States should not accept the way Crimea was annexed into Russia, and should be prepared and willing to apply major economic sanctions should Putin raise the stakes again over Ukraine or Transnistria. Over time, Ukraine should be integrated into EU markets through the completion of the Association Agreement along with substantial financial support.

There can be no return for Putin to the G8 or business-as-usual in NATO until Russian economic and military threats against its European neighbors are lifted and a mutually acceptable solution is found to Crimea's status.

Putin's actions are not a response to European and American provocations. He has painted himself into a corner with a combination of strategic paranoia, dreams of Russian revanche and economic illiteracy. As it seeks to present a strong and united response, the West can ill afford to blame itself.

The views expressed in this commentary are solely those of Robin Niblett.

Part of complete coverage on
July 18, 2014 -- Updated 1642 GMT (0042 HKT)
The shooting down of MH17 may finally alert Washington and Europe to the danger of the conflict in Ukraine.
July 17, 2014 -- Updated 1500 GMT (2300 HKT)
Russia has not taken steps to end Ukraine conflict, President Obama said announcing sanctions against separatists, defense companies.
June 27, 2014 -- Updated 2136 GMT (0536 HKT)
An agreement with the EU formally pushes Ukraine away from Russia. The Kremlin says it's okay with that.
June 28, 2014 -- Updated 1708 GMT (0108 HKT)
Ukrainian President Petro Poroshenko says peace is possible if Vladimir Putin is in the right mood.
July 4, 2014 -- Updated 1458 GMT (2258 HKT)
Vladimir Putin said he hoped for better ties with the United States in a July Fourth message to Barack Obama.
June 27, 2014 -- Updated 1146 GMT (1946 HKT)
EXCLUSIVE: Ukrainian President Poroshenko says he wants peace, and describes negotiations with President Putin.
April 1, 2014 -- Updated 0940 GMT (1740 HKT)
Annexation is no longer the focus of Ukraine crisis. What happened?
June 10, 2014 -- Updated 0033 GMT (0833 HKT)
Civilians are caught in the crossfire between the Ukrainian military and pro-Russian separatists. Diana Magnay reports.
June 7, 2014 -- Updated 1823 GMT (0223 HKT)
Petro Poroshenko sets the tone for his country's conversation with itself and the world, but how will Russia now react?
July 10, 2014 -- Updated 1711 GMT (0111 HKT)
Images from Ukraine amidst violence after President Petro Poroshenko's election
June 2, 2014 -- Updated 1338 GMT (2138 HKT)
In the elegant surroundings of London's Somerset House, one oligarch is using art to get his message across.
May 27, 2014 -- Updated 1957 GMT (0357 HKT)
As fighting continues in eastern Ukraine, many wonder how the region will ever heal. CNN's Nick Paton Walsh reports.
May 27, 2014 -- Updated 1720 GMT (0120 HKT)
Images from Crimea, Donetsk, Kiev and elsewhere as the future of Ukraine lies in doubt.
April 21, 2014 -- Updated 1854 GMT (0254 HKT)
Scenes from Ukraine and Crimea, captured by CNN teams.