Skip to main content
Part of complete coverage on

China's 21st century challenge: Define your narrative or fall behind

By Damien Ma, Special to CNN
January 23, 2014 -- Updated 0949 GMT (1749 HKT)
In November, China's Communist rulers announced an easing of the controversial one-child policy amid a raft of sweeping pledges unveiled including the abolition of 're-education' labor camps and loosening economic controls. In November, China's Communist rulers announced an easing of the controversial one-child policy amid a raft of sweeping pledges unveiled including the abolition of 're-education' labor camps and loosening economic controls.
China today
China today
China today
Chinese idea
China today
China today
China today
China today
  • Damien Ma looks for an indigenous idea to carry China forward in the 21st Century
  • And its transition into a modern state has been anything but smooth, he writes
  • He says few Chinese know or agree on what China should stand for in the 21st Century

Editor's note: Damien Ma is a Fellow at The Paulson Institute, focused on investment and policy programs and the Institute's research and think tank activities. He is the co-author of the book In Line Behind a Billion People: How Scarcity Will Define China's Ascent in the Next Decade. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Damien Ma. Follow him on Twitter.

(CNN) -- If the 21st century belongs to China, as some have argued, then it is worth asking what the defining Chinese idea will be.

It is unsurprising that this very issue has ginned up ferocious debate within China, as the country's might grows but its voice remains meek on the global stage.

Damien Ma
Damien Ma

Economic success alone has yet to evince a self-assured China that it can offer a set of compelling values and ideas to the world. As a country that prides itself on the continuity of its great civilization and cultural force, China seems to grow increasingly dissatisfied with punching below its weight in the world of ideas.

Indeed, much of the 20th century was defined by the rise of the United States and the dominance of the American idea: It was essentially an articulation of what modernity means.

To be modern meant widespread economic prosperity, a healthy middle class, and technological superiority, combined with values that emphasized individual rights and freedoms to pursue whatever lives, liberties, and happiness that one sought. It was a manifestation of the ideals that were enshrined in the Declaration of Independence, a document that, at the young nation's inception, defined what kind of country the United States ought to strive for.

It seems that China has little choice but to look to its distant past in search of a continuous narrative and an indigenous idea that can carry the nation forward in the 21st Century.
Damien Ma

In many ways, the country was born out of a few central ideas because its existence could not be predicated on strong ethnic kinships, bloodlines, or the old monarchical order. It was not the "Old World" but a new nation that was moving toward collective ideals. The belief in the very idea of America was the strongest glue that could bind together a diverse, continental nation.

That cohesive idea has anchored the "American Dream" and provided ballast for themes that are readily found in Hollywood and other popular culture products that pervade the global market. Whether by design or accidental, the genius of the American idea is that it is simply an open source template, or a "default setting," that can be easily replicated and customized in different cultural and institutional environments.

Its power and universalizing appeal is apparent. Little wonder that the American idea gained immense market share and is still widely equated with the general aspiration of obtaining a high living standard and human dignity.

China, in contrast, is both of the old world and a young republic -- or as scholar Lucian Pye once rendered it, "a civilization pretending to be a nation-state." And its transition into a modern state has been anything but smooth.

The modern Chinese state was forged from a nasty civil war, and its recent history since 1949 has been plagued by a series of highly disruptive discontinuities. It has had no continuous narrative from which to draw inspiration and to define the soul of a nation.

'On China:' Can Xi Jinping lead?
Will clean air goals hurt Chinese economy?
Xi borrows from Mao playbook

In fact, the People's Republic under Mao Zedong primarily defined itself as what it is not -- that is, it wasn't feudal or traditional. For the next six decades, the country lurched from devastating revolution to hyper materialism, breaking with whatever ideological milieu that had existed at the time. When Deng Xiaoping took power in 1978, the only "ism" that mattered was pragmatism, as the country went to work on nation building and zeroed in on material prosperity.

Thirty-five years and several trillions worth of GDP later, an entire generation of Chinese is waking up to the fact that it still has little idea of what kind of nation to strive for.

All this relentless work has built a dynamic middle-income economy, yet cumulative wealth is no substitute for the richness of a nation, especially for a China that believes it has much to offer the world. After all, this is a country that once brought the world paper, gunpowder, and the compass. Virtually every Chinese school child knows that.

But few Chinese know or agree on what China should stand for in the 21st century. It is clearly a global economic power, but unlike the United States, China seems to have little desire to stake out social and political values that others might adopt.

The Chinese government, which tightly controls historical narratives, simply cannot look into its recent past to seek out those values because even communism is derived from a Western political philosophy appropriated for Chinese conditions. And politically, it could be potentially disastrous if the government owned up to all the dark chapters in its recent past.

It seems that China has little choice but to look to its distant past in search of a continuous narrative and an indigenous idea that can carry the nation forward in the 21st Century.

The new leadership of the Communist Party, particularly President Xi Jinping, has prioritized this effort because it understands that a major source of its political power is derived from ideological legitimacy. To keep a continental nation together, China, too, needs a ruling party to govern around a set of ideas so that its people can imagine what the country can and should become.

And so the "great rejuvenation" of the Chinese nation has become the new ideological offering -- an explicit effort to connect today's China to the glories of a former empire that sat at the center of the world. It revives the traditional ideas of wealth and power that have defined the country through much of its history.

The Chinese leadership is leaving little doubt that China will once again be a global force that garners respect.

Yet it is far from clear what a rejuvenated China means or how that force might be employed. Reestablishing "national greatness" may win over some of the Chinese public, but it hardly serves as an idea or value proposition that can extend beyond Chinese borders.

Each nation is entitled to deem itself unique, exceptional, and "great" -- the United States certainly does. But some nations also use their wealth and power to articulate a vision of how to shape the world and aspire to address common challenges. The tagline for a U.S. Navy advertisement, for example, is "a global force for good."

China, at least so far, has exhibited little interest in becoming a charge d'affaires with world-shaping responsibilities, even as outside pressures mount for it to assume them. Indeed, it may simply be comfortable with being just China -- an idea that the rest of the world may have to get used to.

Read more: Xi Jinping's 2014 challenge: Resolving an identity crisis?

China marks muted 120th anniversary of Mao Zedong

Mind the gap: China's great education divide

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Damien Ma.

Part of complete coverage on
January 27, 2014 -- Updated 1714 GMT (0114 HKT)
The World Economic Forum in Davos was a missed opportunity to start real dialogue and must change if it is to stay relevant, argues Richard Quest
January 27, 2014 -- Updated 1700 GMT (0100 HKT)
Nina dos Santos was in Davos interviewing world leaders by day, mingling at the parties of millionaires by night. So what are they really like?
January 28, 2014 -- Updated 0902 GMT (1702 HKT)
The World Economic Forum usually attracts protesters but this year's were very quiet. So why were they there?
January 25, 2014 -- Updated 1419 GMT (2219 HKT)
IMF chief Christine Lagarde says governments should beware of the global deflation genie coming out of its bottle.
January 24, 2014 -- Updated 1136 GMT (1936 HKT)
A relentless quest for share price boosts can result in disastrous long-term results, writes Andre Spicer.
January 24, 2014 -- Updated 1753 GMT (0153 HKT)
Actress Goldie Hawn says CEOs are discovering how to cope with stress and make better decisions .
January 24, 2014 -- Updated 2207 GMT (0607 HKT)
Richard Quest speaks to U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon about the progress being made in establishing Syrian peace.
January 25, 2014 -- Updated 1658 GMT (0058 HKT)
selfie Richard Quest
Selfie is the word du jour and CNN's Richard Quest set himself a selfie challenge, but which VIPs agreed to pose?
January 24, 2014 -- Updated 0931 GMT (1731 HKT)
Israel's President points a finger at Iran over the carnage in Syria, due to support for Shiite militant group Hezbollah.
January 24, 2014 -- Updated 0755 GMT (1555 HKT)
World Bank chief Jim Yong Kim calls for a concerted global effort to help Syria's refugees, saying the response so far has been inadequate.
January 24, 2014 -- Updated 2206 GMT (0606 HKT)
Richard Quest speaks to Israeli PM Benjamin Netanyahu about why cyber security is so important to the Israeli economy.
Think you're paid what you're worth? Explore how your wage compares to the average in your country, then see where you sit globally.
January 23, 2014 -- Updated 2225 GMT (0625 HKT)
CNN's Richard Quest speaks to Cantor Fitzgerald CEO Howard Lutnick about the lack of a crisis at Davos 2014.
January 23, 2014 -- Updated 2213 GMT (0613 HKT)
Richard Quest speaks to the OECD's Angel Gurria on how inequality and lack of economic growth are tied together.
January 23, 2014 -- Updated 1910 GMT (0310 HKT)
It's town of cuckoo clocks, $20 pasta and very slippery pavements -- tread carefully, warns first-timer Chris Pepper.
January 23, 2014 -- Updated 1920 GMT (0320 HKT)
Nina dos Santos speaks to former U.S. Treasury Sec. Larry Summers who says public sector investment should be encouraged.
January 23, 2014 -- Updated 0949 GMT (1749 HKT)
Almost 40 years and trillions worth of GDP after Mao, an entire generation still has little idea of what kind of nation to strive for, writes Damien Ma.
January 22, 2014 -- Updated 1518 GMT (2318 HKT)
CNN anchors Richard Quest and Nina dos Santos disagree as to whether this meeting of power players can make a difference to global inequality.
January 23, 2014 -- Updated 0517 GMT (1317 HKT)
The crisis in Syria was front and center for the movers and shakers as Davos formally got underway.
January 22, 2014 -- Updated 1641 GMT (0041 HKT)
Richard Quest heads to Davos, where everyone, it seems, has an event they want him to attend. Read his view of the parties.
January 24, 2014 -- Updated 2204 GMT (0604 HKT)
Richard Quest speaks to European Commission Pres. Jose Manuel Barroso about what can be done about the Ukrainian protests.
January 22, 2014 -- Updated 0818 GMT (1618 HKT)
Egypt has entrusted its democracy to the army, the police, a disempowered political class, writes Aalam Wassef.
Answer 4 questions to tell us if your mood is up or down, and see how others are responding.
January 22, 2014 -- Updated 2301 GMT (0701 HKT)
Speaking at the WEF in Davos, Japanese PM Shinzo Abe said that by 2020 women occupy 30% of leadership positions.
January 22, 2014 -- Updated 1546 GMT (2346 HKT)
Norway's Crown Prince Haakon says it is dangerous not to let youth help reshape the world, as they have the resources to act.
January 22, 2014 -- Updated 1503 GMT (2303 HKT)
Three years after the Arab Spring, its issues are back on the agenda and Syrian peace talks have begun. A Tunisian writer says little has changed.
January 24, 2014 -- Updated 1915 GMT (0315 HKT)
Ostentation-adverse Pope Francis has some serious cards to lay on the table in the game of global economic reform, writes John Allen.
January 21, 2014 -- Updated 1758 GMT (0158 HKT)
The World Economic Forum is not just a global gabfest. History is often made there, as Nina Dos Santos reports.
January 20, 2014 -- Updated 1251 GMT (2051 HKT)
We need to invest in human capital to combat a predatory capitalist system, argues Anne-Marie Slaughter.
January 21, 2014 -- Updated 1304 GMT (2104 HKT)
today's emerging markets can be divided into the tortoises and hares, CNN's John Defterios writes. But which will win 2014?
January 21, 2014 -- Updated 1030 GMT (1830 HKT)
CNN's Isa Soares talks to chef Alexandre Kroll about the challenges of cooking for the world's financial leaders in Davos.
January 21, 2014 -- Updated 1159 GMT (1959 HKT)
Why would a young person with a job, or in education, or training, want to riot and loot, when they have a stake in the future?
January 24, 2014 -- Updated 1929 GMT (0329 HKT)
The small Swiss town of Davos readies for its annual onslaught of world leaders and power players.
January 20, 2014 -- Updated 1552 GMT (2352 HKT)
CNN's Richard Quest says growing income inequality will be high on the agenda at the World Economic Forum.
January 17, 2014 -- Updated 1115 GMT (1915 HKT)
CNN's Richard Quest ponders whether he's climbing a Swiss mountain to learn the meaning of "heterarchy."
January 19, 2014 -- Updated 1214 GMT (2014 HKT)
What will business leaders, heads of government, entrepreneurs and celebrities discuss in Davos?
January 20, 2014 -- Updated 1726 GMT (0126 HKT)
Davos is invitation-only, but even if you made the cut, could you afford the entry fee? And once there, what do you need to do to fit in?