Skip to main content
Part of complete coverage from

Health care ruling can help Romney

By William Bennett, CNN Contributor
July 11, 2012 -- Updated 1557 GMT (2357 HKT)
 Mitt Romney speaks in response to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Healthcare Act
Mitt Romney speaks in response to the U.S. Supreme Court ruling on the Affordable Healthcare Act
  • William Bennett: Chief justice recast the mandate as a tax, which wasn't in the law
  • He says he should have called the mandate a tax and sent it back to Congress
  • He says Obama had insisted it was not a tax; the flip-flop will be GOP ammunition in election
  • Bennett: Romney has been handed a powerful issue to campaign on

Editor's note: William J. Bennett, a CNN contributor, is the author of "The Book of Man: Readings on the Path to Manhood." He was U.S. secretary of education from 1985 to 1988 and director of the Office of National Drug Control Policy under President George H.W. Bush.

(CNN) -- The Supreme Court's verdict on Obamacare is in. As a tax, the individual mandate stands; as a Commerce Clause regulation, it fails.

What remains to be seen is whether Chief Justice John Roberts has crafted a masterly constitutional balancing act -- limiting federal authority and respecting the separations of powers -- or if he has engaged in a disappointing and inappropriate usurpation of the legislative function.

There are arguments on both sides. Some say that Roberts, not wanting to uphold the liberal reasoning behind Obamacare and an unprecedented expansion of federal power, concocted an opinion that would be limiting in scope, while still respecting the law and seeming nonpartisan. Others say that Roberts has unlawfully manipulated the mandate into a tax, thereby giving legs to a law that has none.

William Bennett
William Bennett

What the country thought was a debate over federal regulation of interstate trade has been transformed by Roberts into a debate over Congress' power to shape decisions through taxation. He writes in the majority opinion, "The mandate can be regarded as establishing a condition -- not owning health insurance -- that triggers a tax -- the required payment to IRS."

Tax power: The little argument that could

The dissenters, Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, adamantly disagree: "[T]o say that the Individual Mandate merely imposes a tax is not to interpret the statute but to rewrite it..."

The dissent is right. Roberts recast the mandate as a tax, a rationale that was not in the law or the government's case. He rewrote the administration's position, baptized it, and then blessed it. Roberts' defenders argue that he did so to avoid a constitutional crisis, but he may have created another by judicially re-legislating policy, a policy paid for and enforced by what could be essentially the largest tax increase in American history.

Roberts could have characterized the mandate as a tax and sent it back to the Congress, whose role is to legislate taxation, to redo. In my opinion, that's what he should have done. If Roberts is so concerned with the integrity of the Supreme Court, he should know that its integrity rises and falls with the integrity of its decisions and its adherence to the Constitution, not public perception.

As it stands, the verdict is a serious setback for conservatives, but not a total loss. Roberts' majority opinion does deny Congress the power to mandate health care through the Commerce Clause, dealing a strong blow to future Congresses' ability to legislate social welfare programs. Since Wickard v. Filburn, modern conservatives have lamented the radical expansion of Congress' power to regulate interstate commerce under Article I of the Constitution. This decision may stem the tide.

Supporters of the health care legislation celebrate after the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in a 5-4 ruling Thursday, June 28. Supporters of the health care legislation celebrate after the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in a 5-4 ruling Thursday, June 28.
Health care and the high court
Photos: Health care and the high court Photos: Health care and the high court
Romney's health care response
Obama said mandate isn't tax in 2009
Romney's past complicates mandate attack

Furthermore, the Roberts opinion invalidated Obamacare's penalty on states that refuse the massive expansion of Medicaid subscribers. States can opt out of the expansion of Medicaid and not be subject to a loss of funding. This is no doubt a victory for federalism and the 26 states that filed lawsuits against the government.

Nevertheless, Obamacare will stand until at least the fall elections. For President Barack Obama it is a mixed blessing. On the one hand, it gives the president a political shot in the arm. His signature legislative achievement -- a massive expansion of health care -- has been validated. On the other hand, Obama must now defend his health care bill as a tax increase, something he and other Democratic leaders adamantly denied before the Affordable Care Act was passed.

In a 2009 interview with George Stephanopoulos, Obama was asked repeatedly whether his legislation was a tax. At one point Stephanopoulos said, "But you reject that it's a tax increase?" Obama replied, "I absolutely reject that notion."

This flip-flop will not play well politically with the American people. Obama sold his health plan to the American people as anything but a tax. Had it been presented as the tax it is, it's doubtful it would have passed the Congress during the economic malaise of Obama's first years in office. The American people, particularly the tea party, may feel they are again victims of taxation without representation.

For this reason, the verdict, while a serious judicial blow to conservatives, may favor them politically. Mitt Romney and Republican leaders can now campaign relentlessly against a massive, sweeping tax increase that will fall on the shoulders of an already weak economy. Romney is already reaping the rewards. His campaign reports that he raised $4.6 million in the 24 hours after the Supreme Court decision came down.

Court ruling cements Obama's legacy?

For the next six months, Obamacare will remain hyper-politicized. The terms of the national political debate now center on whether a stalled economy can bear the brunt of higher taxes and more government spending. The Supreme Court did not hand conservatives a lifeline. Elections have consequences and this fall's will be monumental.

Follow us on Twitter @CNNOpinion

Join us on Facebook/CNNOpinion

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of William Bennett.

Part of complete coverage on
The Affordable Care Act
July 5, 2012 -- Updated 1737 GMT (0137 HKT)
In its ruling last week on the national health care law, the Supreme Court found that penalties the law places on people who don't buy health insurance count as a tax protected by the Constitution.
June 28, 2012 -- Updated 2003 GMT (0403 HKT)
The Supreme Court's decision Thursday to uphold the Affordable Care Act means that the predictions about how it will affect Americans remain in place.
June 29, 2012 -- Updated 1454 GMT (2254 HKT)
With his opinion for a narrow majority of the Supreme Court, Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. has, for the first time since his confirmation as chief justice in 2005, breached the gap between the conservative and liberal wings of the court on a polarizing political issue.
June 29, 2012 -- Updated 0123 GMT (0923 HKT)
In a landmark ruling that will impact the November election and the lives of every American, the U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday upheld the controversial health care law championed by President Barack Obama.
Here's a breakdown of the votes an what the Supreme Court justices wrote about the health care ruling.
June 28, 2012 -- Updated 1951 GMT (0351 HKT)
The court's opinion, in preserving the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, under Congress' taxing power, still gives a virtually unlimited sway to the power of the federal government, Stephen Presser writes.
June 28, 2012 -- Updated 1741 GMT (0141 HKT)
Chief Justice Roberts, in a move that likely surprised many, joined the four more liberal justices in declaring that the mandate could survive, but as a tax.
June 28, 2012 -- Updated 1519 GMT (2319 HKT)
What exactly did the Supreme Court decide? Here's the nuts and bolts of their ruling.
June 28, 2012 -- Updated 1530 GMT (2330 HKT)
At stake in the court's ruling is the well-being of millions of Americans living with chronic diseases such as cancer.
June 28, 2012 -- Updated 1525 GMT (2325 HKT)
The Supreme Court is expected to hand down its ruling on the health care reform Thursday. What the justices decide will have an immediate and long-term impact on all Americans.
June 28, 2012 -- Updated 2102 GMT (0502 HKT)
The Supreme Court is set to rule on the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act on Thursday. The landmark decision will dictate the way health care is administered to millions of Americans.
June 17, 2012 -- Updated 1516 GMT (2316 HKT)
A look at key moments in the law's history from the start.
June 28, 2012 -- Updated 1519 GMT (2319 HKT)
A look at the four issues the high court tackled separately during oral arguments in late March. Those issues are expected to play key roles in the judges' final decisions.