Skip to main content

Despite protests, Russian spring still distant dream

By Andrew Keen, CNN contributor
March 6, 2012 -- Updated 1250 GMT (2050 HKT)
Thousands of protesters flooded through Moscow streets Saturday, calling for fair elections.
Thousands of protesters flooded through Moscow streets Saturday, calling for fair elections.
  • Digital commentator Andrew Keen says primacy of Russia's old regime re-established
  • He says opposition politically naive to think digital technology will get rid of Putin
  • In country with limited internet access, politics exists outside online world, argues Keen

Editor's note: Andrew Keen is a British-American entrepreneur and professional skeptic. He is the author of "The Cult of the Amateur," and the upcoming (June 2012) "Digital Vertigo." This is the latest in a series of commentaries for CNN looking at how internet trends are influencing social culture.

(CNN) -- The Russian spring may have been postponed this year, both on and offline.

Last December, after the spontaneous popular demonstrations in Moscow against the "results" of the parliamentary elections, suggested that Russia's internet hamsters might be outfoxing Vladimir Putin. But I'm afraid that this weekend's Presidential elections have reestablished the primacy of the old regime over internet activists. Indeed, even President elect Putin may now be outsmarting popular bloggers like Alexei Navalny.

So much then for the transformational power of the democratic network; so much, too, for the power of digital society to rearrange power in Russia.

Andrew Keen
Andrew Keen

The problem is that the Internet doesn't have transcendental powers. Technology is just technology. It can't magically invent political parties, platforms, ideologies or leaders. And it certainly can't transform the well-intentioned democratic activists on Russian social networks like Vkonkakte and Live Journal into coherent organizations that can effectively challenge Putin's leviathan state.

As one of Moscow's savviest political observers emailed me yesterday about the current political situation in Russia: "It shows that the best defense against revolution are not tanks and security forces, but a phony compromised opposition created by the government to preempt any real opposition.

"It also shows that the opposition that does exist is still very much a limited Moscow phenomenon. The Internet is only a medium. It can't create an appealing opposition candidate out of a bunch of clowns. It also can't create a middle class where there is none."

And as Alexei Navalny tweeted yesterday: "We overestimated ourselves. We thought the rest of the country knew what we know."

So why doesn't the rest of Russia know what the anti-corruption activist Navalny knows?

Putin wins election amid fraud claims
Controversy surrounds Putin's election
Change is 'up to Putin'

According to Edward Shenderovich, a Moscow based venture capitalist who runs Kite Ventures, it's because Putin controls the media. Of the 140 million people who live in Russia, Shenderovich explains, only 35 million of them are on the internet. The rest rely for their information on radio, television and newspapers which are mostly managed by Putin apologists and allies.

The opposition is not only mostly limited to Moscow, but it's also politically naive.

Last night, in Moscow's Pushinskaya square, protestors gathered to demonstrate against the legitimacy of Putin's electoral coronation. It was a slightly disappointing turnout (around 20,000 people) and after Alexei Navalny and presidential candidate Mikail Prokhorov spoke, a rump of the crowd became embroiled with the riot police.

According to, all the talk amongst the resistors was to set up a tent city along the idealistic lines of the Occupy Wall Street movement.

But haven't these Russian activists been keeping up with the news from America? If the Occupy Movement in Manhattan's Zucotti Park couldn't fight Michael Bloomberg's New York City cops, then what chance does a Moscow civic protest camp have against Vladimir Putin's tens of thousands of heavily armed militiamen?

Fortunately, there are some political realists who understand that the most effective way to resist Putin isn't through a directionless Occupy Movement or via absurd theatrical stunts like the FEMEN activist in Moscow who bared her breast at the Moscow polling station where Putin had just voted.

"The opposition now has to recognize the agonizing fact that creative flash-mobs won't get rid of Putin. We need to learn stubborn, routine and -- at a first hipster glance -- useless old-school political work," noted the Opposition leader Vladimir Milov yesterday

The opposition is not only mostly limited to Moscow, but it's also politically naïve
Andrew Keen

Nor will more high-tech digital technology get rid of Putin. Indeed, the regime has cynically appropriated cutting-edge technologies such as "transparent ballot boxes" to establish its honesty. Putin even installed 180,000 web cameras at Russian polling stations in a surreal attempt to prove the legitimacy of an electoral system that is anything but radically transparent.

If there is to be a political spring in Russia, it may be led by the ex CEO of Yukos, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, once the wealthiest man in Russia and now a prisoner in a very low tech Siberian labor camp.

Khodorkovksy has penned a seven point plan for the opposition which include a focus on peaceful protest, the establishment of two or three political parties, getting activists out of Moscow into the regions and establishing working pacts with moderates within Putin's regime.

Khodorkovksy' realism is echoed by the venture capitalist Edward Shenderovich. Demonstrations in Russia will continue, he explained to me. But while the internet is a great "communications platform" for organizing people and collecting money, politics, Shenderovich told me, exists "outside" the online world. The focus, he insists, should be on building a clear opposition leader and platform that will challenge what he calls "the most corrupt society in the world."

"Putin beats the spread", noted Matthew Rojanksy, deputy director of the Russia and Eurasia Program. The losers in the Presidential election, he explained, were the middle class, young people and the United States. But Rojansky left out a fourth loser from Sunday's election: the Russian internet.

• Follow @ajkeen on Twitter

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Andrew Keen

Part of complete coverage on
July 8, 2013 -- Updated 1211 GMT (2011 HKT)
Andrew Keen says we are metaphorically with Snowden, as we embrace more and more devices that monitor all our daily activites.
February 26, 2013 -- Updated 1423 GMT (2223 HKT)
Wearing spectacles that record our every move could be the end of privacy as we know it, says internet commentator Andrew Keen.
November 27, 2012 -- Updated 1603 GMT (0003 HKT)
Much has been written about the Twitterfication of the Gaza war. But there's a much more significant war taking place right now on Twitter.
September 24, 2012 -- Updated 1423 GMT (2223 HKT)
Like all online businesses, the marketing industry is being radically changed by the creeping ubiquity of mobile devices.
December 6, 2012 -- Updated 1544 GMT (2344 HKT)
Leading tech entrepreneurs are meeting at the Le Web conference to celebrate the future - an "internet of things" governed by intelligent devices.
November 27, 2012 -- Updated 1603 GMT (0003 HKT)
A war is taking place about freedom of speech in our new reputation economy; a war about what we legally can and cannot say on Twitter.
May 14, 2012 -- Updated 1538 GMT (2338 HKT)
By 2023, hideously powerful technology companies like the Weyland Corporation will rule the world. At least that's the storyline in "Prometheus."
April 10, 2012 -- Updated 1539 GMT (2339 HKT)
Do we fear governmental abuse of our online data as much as abuse from private companies?
March 30, 2012 -- Updated 1205 GMT (2005 HKT)
Social networking site Google + was launched last year as the internet giant tries to keep up with Facebook.
Is Google's remarkable dominance of the internet economy now under threat?
March 14, 2012 -- Updated 1650 GMT (0050 HKT)
A local organization hosts a screening of
Should we really be empowering children to make moral decisions about a world in which they have little experience?
February 28, 2012 -- Updated 1031 GMT (1831 HKT)
With our increasing addiction to our mobile phones, we are in danger of creating a monster that we are less and less able to control.
March 6, 2012 -- Updated 1250 GMT (2050 HKT)
An uprising in Russia appears unlikely after presidential elections reestablished the primacy of the old regime, argues Andrew Keen
February 21, 2012 -- Updated 1434 GMT (2234 HKT)
There's a trillion dollar virus that spreading throughout Silicon Valley called social networking that feeds on our most intimate data.
February 3, 2012 -- Updated 1051 GMT (1851 HKT)
As Facebook prepares its billion-dollar IPO the question is whether it can make the world a better place for it s close to a billion users.
January 25, 2012 -- Updated 1637 GMT (0037 HKT)
Just as oil shaped the 20th century economy, so the politics of data will shape the 21st century digital economy, says Andrew Keen.
Our politics may not be the catastrophe-bound Titanic but they are wrecked on shallow ground, unable to move, says Andrew Keen.
December 23, 2011 -- Updated 1427 GMT (2227 HKT)
The role of employment in society will increasingly shape our attitude toward technology over the next year, says Andrew Keen.
January 13, 2012 -- Updated 1803 GMT (0203 HKT)
Andrew Keen says the future of the Consumer Electronics Show is online, not at trade shows where delegates spend too much time standing in line.
December 13, 2011 -- Updated 1046 GMT (1846 HKT)
The future of Russia may be determined by the very digital critics which its current leadership seeks to deride, argues Andrew Keen.