Cookie consent

We use cookies to improve your experience on this website. By continuing to browse our site you agree to our use of cookies. Tell me more | Cookie preferences

Fukushima's 'cold' reactors pose a constant threat

    Just Watched

    Look inside Fukushima's meltdown zone

Look inside Fukushima's meltdown zone 02:37

Story highlights

  • Threats remain despite cold shutdown at Fukushima plant
  • Meltdown at three reactors after last year's earthquake
  • Nuclear fuel needs constant cooling, contamination water stored nearby
  • Nearly 700 aftershocks have been recorded since the March 11 quake

Twisted metal beams still jut from the top of Japan's Fukushima Daiichi stricken reactors, almost one year after a massive tsunami triggered nuclear meltdown.

They remain as an eerie monument to the country's worst ever nuclear disaster, frozen in time by the dangers that surround the reactors and what's inside.

The reactors at the northern Japanese plant were declared last December to be in cold shutdown, a term used to indicate that operations are under control and pose no immediate threat.

Michael Friedlander, a former senior operator at U.S. nuclear power plants, said in this instance the words "cold shutdown" are "completely inappropriate" to describe the situation at the Fukushima plant.

Inside Fukushima's meltdown zone

"There reactors are very much cold from a nuclear standpoint and from an energy standpoint, and the likelihood of it ever having another criticality or having another explosion is virtually zero," he said.

      Just Watched

      Teacher: Storms disrupting families

    Teacher: Storms disrupting families 02:51

      Just Watched

      Animals left to die in Fukushima zone

    Animals left to die in Fukushima zone 02:48

      Just Watched

      2011: Moving on post-tsunami difficult

    2011: Moving on post-tsunami difficult 02:44

      Just Watched

      2011: Kids swept away from Japan school

    2011: Kids swept away from Japan school 02:39

    "But it's a consequence of the fact that they've now been shut down for a year, much more so than anything that TEPCO or that anybody else has ever done," he said, referring to the plant's operators Tokyo Electric Power Company.

    The biggest threat to the stability of the reactors, Friedlander said, is another earthquake or external event that causes a radioactive leak.

    "The biggest real risk is that a pipe breaks and that hundreds of thousands of gallons of highly radioactive water ends up underground or ends up leeching back into the ocean or something like that. That's the real bottom line," he said.

    "The chance of a massive contamination or a massive plume of radioactive contamination is almost zero," he added.

    On March 11, 2011 more than 15,000 people died after a magnitude-9.0 earthquake ruptured a 300 kilometer long fault stretching from the southern end of Japan's Ibaraki Prefecture to the middle of the Iwate Prefecture.

    The tremor generated a massive tsunami which smashed into the coast, swamping three prefectures including Fukushima, the site of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant.

    Three of the plant's six reactors suffered meltdowns despite frantic efforts to flood them with seawater to bring surging temperatures down.

    During a tour of the nuclear plant, manager Takeshi Takahashi told CNN's Kyung Lah that the biggest risk is if something goes wrong with the reactors. The nuclear fuel needs constant cooling. Huge tanks around the site hold water contaminated with radiation and finding more space to store the water is a constant challenge.

    "The reactors are no more or no less stable than they were in April of last year," Friedlander said. "They fundamentally continue to be reliant on a feed and bleed cooling mechanism and anything can happen. Another earthquake could happen; another tsunami could happen."

    Nearly 700 aftershocks of magnitude 5 or greater have been registered since last year's quake, according to a report released in January by the University of Tokyo's Earthquake Research Institute.

    The report warned that there was a 70% chance that a magnitude-7 quake would hit Tokyo's metropolitan area within four years. The probability rose to 98% probability within the next 30 years, it added.

    Tokyo see high quake probability, scientists warn

    Friedlander said that while the ticking bomb nature of the Fukushima disaster "very appropriately" focused attention on stabilizing the site, a year later the world should be paying more attention to the inevitable spread of radioactive material.

    "I think that the reason why people don't give it attention is because they say, you know, the levels of concentration are very low, so even if you did become contaminated the risk to you is actually quite low, which is true," he said.

    "But again, when you start exposing millions and millions and millions of people to very low levels of concentration, it's inevitable that it's going to have an impact."

    Last week, fish and plankton collected from the Pacific Ocean near the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant were said to contain elevated levels of radioactive materials.

    However, the levels were below those that pose a threat to public health, according to Nicholas Fisher, a marine science professor at New York's Stony Brook University.

    The samples were taken in June 2011, outside the 30-kilometer (19-mile) exclusion zone around the plant, at points in and around the Kuroshio Current, the Pacific version of the Gulf Stream.

    Fisher said that the contaminants were more likely to have settled in coastal sediments, of which little is known. "There's a lot of key missing information about the sediments," he said.

      Rebuilding Japan

    • This picture taken by a Miyako City official on March 11, 2011 and released on March 18, 2011 shows a tsunami breeching an embankment and flowing into the city of Miyako in Iwate prefecture shortly after a 9.0 magnitude earthquake hit the region of northern Japan. The official number of dead and missing after the devastating earthquake and tsunami that flattened Japan's northeast coast a week ago has topped 16,600, with 6,405 confirmed dead, it was announced on March 18, 2011. AFP PHOTO / JIJI PRESS (Photo credit should read JIJI PRESS/AFP/Getty Images)

      Did events on March 11, 2011 affect your life? Share before and after photos of your area, or grab a video camera and let us know what life is like today.
    • An aerial view shows the quake-damaged Fukushima nuclear power plant in the Japanese town of Futaba, Fukushima prefecture on March 12, 2011. Japan scrambled to prevent nuclear accidents at two atomic plants where reactor cooling systems failed after a massive earthquake, as it evacuated tens of thousands of residents. Tokyo Electric Power, which runs the plants, said it had released some radioactive vapour into the atmosphere at one plant to relieve building reactor pressure, but said the move posed no health risks. AFP PHOTO / JIJI PRESS (Photo credit should read STR/AFP/Getty Images)

      A Fukushima Prefecture evacuee made a brief visit to his radiation-contaminated home, walked to his shuttered shop, and then hanged himself.
    • Tourism in Japan has been badly hit by the quake.

      See how areas hit by the tsunami looked just after the disaster and how they look today.
    • The morning sun shines on the Kamaishi Bay while a huge buddha statue of 'Kamaishi Kannon' stands on the top of the mountain at the tsunami-devastated city of Kamaishi, Iwate prefecture on May 12, 2011.

      Scientist Ken Buesseler looks at what's known -- and not known -- about the largest accidental release of radioactivity into the ocean.
    • A TEPCO worker explains the situation at the stricken Fukushima Daiichi nuclear plant, February 28, 2012.

      Twisted metal beams still jut from the top of Japan's Fukushima Daiichi stricken reactors, almost one year after a massive tsunami triggered nuclear meltdown.